starseerdrgn: Reihanfēoru-kama (Default)

I’m not even going to beat around the bush with this post. Why are people such outright dicks when it comes to what type of computer or phone other people use?

  • I see so many Windows users scoff or laugh at anyone who uses a Mac, with the thought that they’re “underpowered and overpriced”.
  • I see Mac users—far fewer than in the past—attack Windows users in retaliation, and some attack Windows users for being “stupid”.
  • I see Linux users attack anyone who uses “non-free software”, or for not following the free software mentality.
  • I see Android users taunt iPhone users for buying “overpriced” hardware.
  • I see iPhone users taunt Android users for having “malware-riddled” phones.

It’s just insane that these people go so far out of their way to attack others, just to deal with their own inadequacies.

I use a Mac. I’m still a fan of Windows 7 and Windows Vista. I’m still a fan of Gentoo. I use an iPhone, but I also own Android, Windows Phone, and Firefox OS devices. I won’t make fun of someone for making their own choices.

But I’ll never understand why others do it. It just makes no sense to me.

starseerdrgn: Reihanfēoru-kama (Default)

I'm using my MacBook Air and Mac Mini once again. Microsoft under Satya Nadella is proving to be more untrustworthy than it ever was under Steve Ballmer, with the company going in three different paths at the same time: open-sourcing some things, clamping down on others, and rendering their Windows project a mess. Windows 10 is trying to be an evergreen OS, much like the many web browsers out there.

The problem is that, like many people, I prefer some actual stability with my work environment, and Apple doesn't make drastic changes on OS X nearly as often as Microsoft does with Windows. For the most part, Mac OS 10.11 (El Capitan) looks and acts like Mac OS 10.8 (Mountain Lion), and even 10.4 (Tiger). There are always new features and apps (iCloud,, etc…), but they don't change the entire OS to the point that you would need to train yourself again.

Apple keeps it simple, and that's a plus for someone like me.

Yes, I'm well aware that the hardware is more expensive, but at the same time, is that really a bad thing? If the hardware doesn't break for long periods (5 years or more), then I'm only having to pay for it occasionally. And it's not like I'll have to worry about the SSD in my MacBook, since I can boot from a USB 3 drive and continue like normal.

And of course, people will likely point out the massive failures from Apple (like the current "trash can" Mac Pro), but no good company is without its failures. It's what they do with those failures that determines how good they are.

Microsoft did good things under Ballmer, and often learned from their mistakes. I don't see that happening under Nadella, and I don't really see that happening in the FOSS world.

Plus, for people who take the piss out of me for going Mac instead of Linux, all I can say to that is this: "At least us Gentoo users can get things done, instead of fighting a losing war against piss-poor package managers. 🙃"

starseerdrgn: Reihanfēoru-kama (Default)

As I had been using my new Surface Pro 3 as my primary device for my typical “30 day trial”, I was also forced to use Windows 10. I must say, even an unstable Arch Linux partition would be much more stable than Windows 10.

First of all, application stability. Simply switching applications would often cause background applications to become unstable. For example, going from Word to Pale Moon and back often caused Word to simply lock up and crash. Word, OneNote, and Store apps were the most problematic, but any app had a chance of falling apart just from using Alt+Tab or Win+Tab. Just today alone, I lost almost 10K words worth of work in MS Word, both from Word itself crashing, and OneDrive crashing. Even Windows Vista does not have these issues, and yet, Windows 10 does.

Then there is OneDrive’s stability. OneDrive has been my primary cloud storage solution since the drives in my home’s NAS began to fail, and in Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows Phone 8, it works extremely well. In Windows 10, OneDrive becomes so unstable that a 4KB file could instantly fail to upload, and do so silently in the background. I do not know what level of idiocy has befallen Windows 10’s APIs, but to go from “working perfectly” to “working less than 10% of the time” is absolutely unacceptable for a productivity environment. Mercifully, I do have an external HDD, and I can use Dropbox for some documents until I can revive the NAS with new HDDs.

Then…there is the update problem. Windows 10’s updates being forced on the user is bad, but when they break functionality and have no way to fully roll back the update, that is completely unacceptable. Windows 10 is made for a beta testing environment, not a production environment. Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 allow the user to stop an update from taking hold, and this is a key requirement for having a stable system.

In Microsoft’s efforts to have an evergreen operating system—a feature that many people in the technology industry want, but not as many non-technical users—they have managed to copy Google’s eternal beta design a little too well. Unlike Google, Microsoft’s Windows 10 is actually in a perpetual beta state.

I will continue to use my Surface, but only as an art tablet. My laptop will be used for writing, as I can rely on it.

January 2017

151617181920 21


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 24th, 2017 06:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios